We live for type. The FontFeed is an inspirational journal of typography tips, recommended fonts, and bits of design from around the web that caught our typographic eye.
I AMsterdam in Avenir
Photo by Mieke Tacken. See more photos of I amsterdam on Flickr.
As much as I’d like to claim we’re the only group to think of it, there is more than one “I Am” campaign. Adidas and Reebok have both used the phrase in recent marketing. (That’s everyone’s favorite blackletter, Fette Fraktur, in the Reebok ads.)
But my favorite “I am” (other than our own of course) is the city of Amsterdam’s decidedly typographic public art installation, “I amsterdam”, set in 10 pt.ft. Avenir. The piece coincides with a new motto and website for the Netherlands capital’s tourism campaign and it works beautifully. The only quibble might be that a country with such a rich type culture ought to use a Dutch face rather than something born in Switzerland. Yet Frutiger’s sans works so well it’s hard to complain.
By Stephen Coles | link | | 
November 5th, 2005 at 1:43 am
Interesting how they had to add serifs to the cap I, lest passers-by confuse it with a piece of street furniture. BTW: Avenir is the typeface for the city’s corporate design programme, developed by EDEN, formerly BRS Premsela Vonk.
I also like the a_m ligature needed for stability as much as legibility.
November 7th, 2005 at 4:32 am
Well, being born and raised in asmterdam, i just had to have a say in this!
This whole campaign (by KesselsKramer) was such a sign of weakness, on all levels. The slogan (besides being stupid) was nicked from an artist that used it on a series of postcards some three years ago, that were freely distributed all over the city. about the logo: the i got serifs, the a and m had to be connected, otherwise people would not be able to understand the pun (i am - amsterdam).
In the light of recent social and political developments in amsterdam it is just so pitiful to see this project used by the city counsel to create a feeling of unity among its inhabitants. how superficial can you get? i guess it only made KesselsKramer happy! – Donald Beekman
December 4th, 2005 at 2:13 am
Take a look at an example of public *art using typography that is absolutely hideous. It’s only forgivable because it’s brown and blends in to the landscape (somewhat).
* Art because it certainly isn’t trying to be wayfinding or signage.